Stevens v. Morgan et al
| Carla Felicia Stevens |
| Todd Morgan and Traveler's Insurance |
| 3:2010cv00396 |
| October 20, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Timothy S. Black |
| Sharon L Ovington |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FILED ON OCTOBER 27, 2010 (Doc. 4 ); DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. 3 ); CERTIFYING PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §1915(A)(3) THAT AN APPEAL OF THIS DECISION AND ENTRY WOULD NOT BE TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH; AND TERMINATING THE CASE ON THE DOCKET OF THIS COURT. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 12/2/10. (cib1)
|
|
Filing
4
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 3 Amended Complaint. IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint be DISMISSED without prejudice to filing in state court; 2. The Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of an Order adopting this Report and Recommendations would not be taken in good faith, and consequently, leave for Plaintiff to appeal in forma pauperis should be denied; and 3. The case be terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 11/15/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 10/27/10. (cib1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
