Norris v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Norris v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction

Norris v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction

Defendant:	Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
Petitioner:	Robert Lee Norris
Case Number:	3:2011cv00204
Filed:	June 13, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Dayton Office
County:	MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge:	Michael R Merz
Presiding Judge:	Thomas M Rose
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 28, 2011	Filing 14 ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING NORRISS OBJECTIONS (Doc. # 12 ) TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING NORRIS'S NOTICE OF APPEAL; ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGES REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. # 11 ) IN ITS ENTIRETY AND CERTIFYING THAT NORRIS'S APPEAL IS OBJECTIVELY FRIVOLOUS AND THAT NORRIS SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 12/28/11. (pb1)
July 14, 2011	Filing 7 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is hereby ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of jurisdiction over the first claim and want of personal jurisdiction of the custodian on the second claim. The case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 07/14/11. (pb1)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 28, 2011

Filing 14 ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING NORRISS OBJECTIONS (Doc. # 12 ) TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING NORRIS'S NOTICE OF APPEAL; ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGES REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. # 11 ) IN ITS ENTIRETY AND CERTIFYING THAT NORRIS'S APPEAL IS OBJECTIVELY FRIVOLOUS AND THAT NORRIS SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 12/28/11. (pb1)

July 14, 2011

Filing 7 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is hereby ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of jurisdiction over the first claim and want of personal jurisdiction of the custodian on the second claim. The case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 07/14/11. (pb1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Norris v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Robert Lee Norris
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?