Kreger v. Norfolk Southern Raillway Company
| Heather Kreger |
| Norfolk Southern Raillway Company |
| 3:2011cv00277 |
| August 4, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| PREBLE |
| Walter H Rice |
| Federal Employers Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 151 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: TERMINATION ENTRY - The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the pa rties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days,reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Parties intending to preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement shouldbe aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America , 114 S.Ct. 1673 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry.The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 6/11/2013. (kf)
|
|
Filing
22
ENTRY SETTING NEW TRIAL DATE AND OTHER DATES,- Trial upon the merits of the captioned cause, currently set for January 7, 2013, is ordered reset for Monday, June 10,2013. The final pretrial conference will be held, by conference call telephone comm unication, beginning at 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 28, 2013. A jointly prepared final pretrial order must be filed with the Court, not later than the close of business on Tuesday, May 21, 2013. All exhibits are to be exchanged, by and between the pa rties, not later than the close of business on Friday, May 24, 2013. All pretrial motions, such as motions in limine, etc., must be filed not later than the close of business on Tuesday, May 14, 2013. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 12/12/12. (pb1)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER FOR COURT-CONDUCTED MEDIATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 10/22/2012. (kf)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER: This matter being heard on the parties joint motion to extend discovery. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the motion is granted. The new discovery schedule is as follows: 1. Disclosure of plaintiff's expert witnesses and reports: 9/1/12. 2. Plaintiff to make settlement demand 9/15/12. 3. Disclosure of defendant's expert witnesses and reports 1/1/12. Motions terminated: 13 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 7/2/12. (kje1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kreger v. Norfolk Southern Raillway Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Norfolk Southern Raillway Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Heather Kreger | |
| Represented By: | Robert E Harrington, III |
| Represented By: | Robert E Harrington, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
