Composite Technologies, L.L.C. v. Inoplast Composites SA DE CV
Plaintiff: Composite Technologies, L.L.C.
Defendant: Inoplast Composites SA DE CV
Case Number: 3:2011cv00279
Filed: August 8, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge: Thomas M Rose
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER DISMISSING CASE - The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Parties intending to preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 114 S.Ct. 1673 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 4-29-2014. (de)
March 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER - The discovery phase of this case has ended. No discovery motion or other matter referred to the undersigned Judicial Officer remains pending. The case is presently set for further proceedings, including trial, before United States District Thomas M. Rose. The Clerk of Courts, therefore, is directed to note in the record that: 1. Referral of this case to the undersigned Judicial Officer has expired; and 2. No motion or other matter in this case remains pending before the undersigned Judicial Officer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 03/24/14. (pb1)
July 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING CTCs MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 23 ) AND DISMISSING INOPLASTS COUNTERCLAIM WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 7/22/2013. (kf)
February 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ENTRY AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT INOPLAST'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. # 12 ). Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 02/26/13. (pb1)
June 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting 6 Motion for Special Appointment of Process Server to Transmit Pleadings Abroad for Service. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 6/7/12. (kje1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Composite Technologies, L.L.C. v. Inoplast Composites SA DE CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Inoplast Composites SA DE CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Composite Technologies, L.L.C.
Represented By: Richard Albert Talda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?