Howard v. Reid Hospital et al
Plaintiff: Corbin J. Howard
Defendant: Reid Hospital, Shannon Roshan and Ronald Moore
Case Number: 3:2011cv00287
Filed: August 12, 2011
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: PREBLE
Presiding Judge: Sharon L Ovington
Presiding Judge: Thomas M Rose
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 40 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Report and Recommendations 39 is ADOPTED in full; Plaintiff's Motion for Rule 60(b) relief 38 is DENIED; the Court certifies pursuant to 28 USC 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of this Order adopting the Report and Recommendations would not be taken in good faith, and consequently, leave for Plaintiff to appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED. Case remains terminated upon the docket. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 9/18/13. (ep)
August 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 39 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending Plaintiff Corbin J. Howards Motion for Rule 60(b) relief be DENIED; The Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3) that an appeal of an Order adopting this Report and Recommendations would not be take n in good faith, and consequently, leave for Plaintiff to appeal in forma pauperis should be denied; and, the case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 9/16/2013. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 8/30/2013. (rms)
August 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 36 JUDGMENT - Case Terminated. Notice of Disposal attached. Signed on 8/28/12. (kje1)
August 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 34 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. Defendant Ronald Moore's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 21 ) be GRANTED and this case DISMISSED. 2. The Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that for the foregoing reasons a n appeal of an Order adopting this Report and Recommendations would not be taken in good faith, and consequently, leave for Plaintiff to appeal in forma pauperis should be denied. 3. The case be terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 8/27/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 8/10/12. (kje1)
April 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 31 DECISION AND ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on April 4, 2012 (Doc. 29 ) is ADOPTED in full. 2. Defendant Reid Hospital and Shannon Roshan's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 17 ) is GRANTED and this case DISM ISSED with prejudice as to these parties. 3. Reid Defendants' Motion to Strike and for Sanctions (Doc. 25 ) is DENIED.4. Reid Defendants' Motion to Designate Trial Attorneys (Doc. 19 ) is DENIEDas moot. 5. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, and consequently, leave for Plaintiff to appeal in forma pauperis is denied. 6. The case remains pending on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 4/25/12. (kje1) Modified on 4/25/2012 to correct text(kje1).
April 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING - At the hearing, Plaintiff should be prepared to show this Court any contacts Defendant Moore had with the forum state (Ohio) that may establish either general or specific personal jurisdiction. The hearing is only to address the issue of personal jurisdiction. Evidentiary Hearing set for 5/29/2012 at 2:30 PM in Courtroom 5 - Dayton before Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 4/4/12. (kje1)
January 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 20 NOTICE TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF OF MOTION TO DISMISS - Under the rules of this Court (S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 7.2), you are allowed twenty-one days from the date of service (January 3, 2012) within which to file a response to the Motion toDismiss, plus an extr a three days if the Motion was served on you by mail.Your response to the Motion to Dismiss must be filed with the Court not later than January 27, 2012. If you fail to file a timely response to the Motion to Dismiss, your claims against Defendants Reid Hospital and Shannon Roshan may be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 01/06/12. (pb1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Howard v. Reid Hospital et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Corbin J. Howard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Reid Hospital
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shannon Roshan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ronald Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?