Chasteen v. Mack et al
Plaintiff: Adam Chasteen
Defendant: Mona Parks, Ernie Moore, Hogan, Alan Mattingly, Tim Schweitzer, Lawrence Mack, Rudolph Divins, Paul Shoemaker, Klopfenstein, Bloomer, William Eleby and Gary Croft
Case Number: 3:2013cv00037
Filed: February 5, 2013
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge: Michael R Merz
Presiding Judge: Thomas M Rose
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 39 JUDGMENT with attached Notice of Disposal in favor of Bloomer, Hogan, Klopfenstein, State of Ohio, Alan Mattingly, Ernie Moore, Gary Croft, Lawrence Mack, Mona Parks, Paul Shoemaker, Rudolph Divins, Tim Schweitzer, William Eleby against Adam Chasteen. Case Terminated. Signed on 8/1/2013. (kf)
June 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 36 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Having reconsidered the matter upon recommittal, the Magistrate Judge again respectfully recommends that the Complaint herein be dismissed with prejudice as barred by the statute of limitations to the extent it seeks monetary damages against the Defendants in their individual capacities, dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction against the Defendants in their official capacities, and dismissed with prejudice on account of mootness to the extent it seeks injunctive relief. Objections to R&R due by 7/11/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 6/24/2013. (kpf1)
June 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 33 RECOMMITTAL ORDER re 32 Objection to Report and Recommendations filed by Adam Chasteen. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 6/11/2013. (kf)
May 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 31 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that Plaintiff's Complaint against Defendants in their official capacities be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction by virtue of the Eleventh Amendment, t hat his claims for injunctive relief be dismissed with prejudice as moot for lack of standing, and that his claims for monetary damages be dismissed with prejudice as barred by the statute of limitationsObjections to R&R due by 6/7/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 5/21/2013. (kpf1)
May 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 22 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Hogan, Klopfenstein, Alan Mattingly. Objections to R&R due by 6/6/2013. Based on the foregoing analysis, it is respectfully recommended that Pl aintiffs claims against Defendants Hogan, Mattingly, and Klopfenstein in their official capacities be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction by virtue of the Eleventh Amendment,that his claims for injunctive relief be dismissed with prejudice as moot for lack of standing, and that his claims for monetary damages against these Defendants be dismissed with prejudice as barred by the statute of limitations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 5/20/2013. (kf)
April 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF UPON FILING OF MOTION TO DISMISS OR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. You are hereby notified that Defendants Croft, Eleby, Moore, Parks and Shoemaker filed with the Court on April 24, 2013, a motion to dismiss in this case Doc [ 26]. You should receive a copy of the motion directly from Defendants. Under the rules of this Court (S.D. Ohio L.R. 7.2) you are allowed twenty-one days from the date of service (April 24, 2013) within which to file a response to this motion, plus a n extra three days because of the way the motion was sent to you. Since your response date falls on a Saturday, your time to file your response with the Court is not later than May 20, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 4/25/2013. (kf)
April 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF UPON FILING OF MOTION TO DISMISS OR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 22 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Hogan, Klopfenstein, Alan Mattingly. Under the rules of this Court (S.D. Ohio L. R. 7.2) you are allowed twenty-one days from the date of service (April 22, 2013) within which to file a response to this motion, plus an extra three days because of the way the motion was sent to you. Your response must be filed with the Court not later than May 16, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 4/22/2013. (kf)
April 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER GRANTING PACER FEE EXCEPTION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 4/18/2013. (kpf1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chasteen v. Mack et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mona Parks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ernie Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hogan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alan Mattingly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tim Schweitzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lawrence Mack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rudolph Divins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul Shoemaker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Klopfenstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bloomer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Eleby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gary Croft
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adam Chasteen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?