Bolling v. Morgan
| Anthony K. Bolling |
| Donald Morgan |
| 3:2013cv00116 |
| April 17, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Michael R Merz |
| Walter H Rice |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. # 16 ); OVERRULING PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS THERETO (DOC. # 17 ); OVERRULING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT OR ORDER (DOC. # 15 ); JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY; CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS DENIED; CASE TO REMAIN TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 05/14/14. (pb1)
|
|
Filing
16
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Bolling has failed to demonstrate that extraordinary circumstances require reopening this Court's final judgment. His Motion for Relief from Judgment should therefore be DENIED. Because reasonable jurists would not d isagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous. Objections to R&R due by 5/9/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 4/22/2014. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
14
CLERKS JUDGMENT with Attached Notice of Disposal. Signed on 08/22/13. (pb1)
|
|
Filing
11
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - re 6 - Petitioner's Objections are without merit and it is again respectfully recommended that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice as time-barred. Because reasonable jurists would notdisagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous. Objections to R&R due by 8/19/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 8/2/13. (kje1)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER TO PETITIONER TO AMEND OBJECTIONS AND FILE INDEX. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 7/23/2013. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
8
RECOMMITTAL ORDER - This matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with Instructions to file a supplemental report analyzing the Objections and Respnse and making recommendations based on that analysis. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 7/19/13. (kje1)
|
|
Filing
6
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice as time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244. Objections to R&R due by 7/19/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 7/2/2013. (kpf1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bolling v. Morgan | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Anthony K. Bolling | |
| Represented By: | George Andrew Katchmer, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Donald Morgan | |
| Represented By: | M Scott Criss |
| Represented By: | Gene D Park |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
