Chambers et al v. West Carrollton Police Department
Plaintiff: Nathalie Chambers and Lamar Chambers
Defendant: West Carrollton Police Department
Case Number: 3:2013cv00279
Filed: August 21, 2013
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge: Sharon L Ovington
Presiding Judge: Walter H Rice
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 16 CLERK'S JUDGMENT with attached Notice of Disposal. Signed on 05/09/14. (pb1)
April 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 9 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED, and the case be terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 5/8/2014. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 4/21/14. (mm1)
August 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: 1. Given Plaintiffs in forma pauperis status, he is entitled to have service of process made by the United States Marshal (USM). To avail himself of such service, Plaintiff must properly prepare and submit to the Clerk of Court the summons for m and the USM Form 285 for each defendant. Although Plaintiff has prepared a summons, he has yet to prepare and submit to the Clerk of Court the required USM Form 285. Upon receipt of this material from the Clerk of Court, the United States Marshal i s ORDERED to make service of process in this case under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. 2. Plaintiff must serve the defendant(s) or their attorney in the event an attorneys appearance is entered in the record with a copy of every document submitted for consideration by the Court. Plaintiff shall include with the original paper to be filed with the Clerk of Court a certificate stating the date and verifying that Plaintiff mailed a true and c orrect copy of any document to defendant(s) or their attorney. Any paper received by a District Judge or Magistrate Judge that has not been filed with the Clerk of Court or that fails to include a certificate of service will be disregarded by the Cou rt. 3. Plaintiff must inform the Clerk of Court promptly of any changes of address which he has during the pendency of this lawsuit. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of his case for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 8-27-13. (slo1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chambers et al v. West Carrollton Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: West Carrollton Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathalie Chambers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lamar Chambers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?