Laning et al v. Doyle et al
| Marcia L Laning and Franklin P Laning |
| Brian M Doyle, Robert Schommer and City of Huber Heights Ohio |
| 3:2014cv00024 |
| January 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Walter H Rice |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's request for in camera inspection re 47 Motion for Protective Order, Motion to Quash. Parties shall produce the documents identified in this Order no later than 10/25/2015. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 10/8/15. (cf).
|
|
Filing
34
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (DOC. #23) - CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, Doc. #23, is SUSTAINED IN PART and OVERRULED IN PART, as follows: All claims against Chief Schommer and Sergeant John Doe (Count Ill), and all claims brought against Officer Doyle in his official capacity, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; The following claims brought against Officer Doyle in his individual capacity are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: Count 1: Unlawful Seizure, Detention, Search and Arrest Count IV: Count V: Count VII: Count X: claim) Malicious Prosecution False Arrest Assault and Battery (federal claim) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (federal The following claims brought against Officer Doyle in his individual capacity remain pending: Count II : Excessive Force (42 U.S.C. § 1983) Count VI: Retaliatory Arrest (42 U.S.C. § 1 983) Count VIII: Assault and Battery (state claim) Count IX: Loss of Consortium (state claim) Count X: claim) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (state Claim for compensatory and punitive damages The following claim brought against the City of Huber Heights remains pending: Count Ill (42 U.S.C. § 1983 only). Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 2/18/2015. (srb1)
|
|
Filing
18
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. # 12 ); OVERRULING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (DOC. # 4 ), AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (DOC. # 13 ); PLAINTIFFS TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS DECISION AND ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 06/20/14. (pb1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
