Coles v. Mancor Industries et al
Plaintiff: Anthony Coles
Defendant: Mancor Industries and I Force
Case Number: 3:2015cv00420
Filed: November 24, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Newman
Presiding Judge: Walter H. Rice
Nature of Suit: Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 7 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. # 4 ) ; OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS THERETO (DOC. # 6 ); DISMISSING COMPLAINT (DOC. # 2 ) WITH PREJUDICE; JUDGMENT TO ENTER IN FAVOR OF DEFE NDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF; CERTIFYING THAT AN APPEAL WOULD NOT BE TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH, AND DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 3/23/16. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION1 THAT THE COURT DISMISS THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) AND FED. R. CIV. P. 12(h)(3)- Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the Court DISMISS this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2)(B)(i ) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). It is further RECOMMENDED that the Court CERTIFY that an appeal of an Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would be frivolous and not taken in good faith, and therefore Plaintiff be DENIED in forma pauperis status on such an appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). re 2 Complaint filed by Anthony Coles Objections to R&R due by 12/28/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 12/9/15. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coles v. Mancor Industries et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Coles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mancor Industries
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: I Force
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?