Matthews v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Petitioner: Anson J. Matthews
Respondent: Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Case Number: 3:2016cv00381
Filed: September 2, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: MIAMI
Presiding Judge: Michael R. Merz
Presiding Judge: Thomas M. Rose
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 17 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MERZ (DOC. 12 ), AMENDED SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 9 ), SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 6 ), AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 3 ), AND OVERRULING PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 16), PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO AMENDED SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 13 ), PETITIONER'S OB JECTIONS TO SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 10 ), AND PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 7 ), THE MAGISTRATE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, (DOC. 16 ), DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS,(DOC. 1 ), AND TERMINATING THE INSTANT CASE. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 11/29/16. (ep)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
October 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 12 SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is again respectfully recommended that the Petition herein be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 11/10/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 10/24/2016. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
October 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 9 AMENDED SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Objections are not well taken. The Magistrate Judge therefore again respectfully recommends that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 10/31/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 10/14/2016. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
October 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Anson J. Matthews Objections to R&R due by 10/24/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 10/5/2016. (srb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
September 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Magistrate Judge respectfully recommends that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability an d the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 10/3/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 9/14/2016. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Matthews v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Anson J. Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?