Stanley et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
| Shawn Stanley and Rebecca Stanley |
| CitiMortgage, Inc. |
| 3:2017cv00099 |
| March 24, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| GREENE |
| Walter H. Rice |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING PLAINTIFFS SHAWN M. STANLEY AND REBECCA STANLEY'S FILING OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY (DOC. # 23 ) AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. # 19 ), AND OVERRULING OBJECTIONS OF PL AINTIFFS (DOC. # 21 ) TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING; MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANT CITIMORTGAGE, INC. (DOC. # 10 ) IS SUSTAINED, CLAIMS ONE THROUGH SIX OF PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT (DOC. #1 ); ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; CLAIM SEVEN AS RAISED BY SHAWN STANLE Y IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE SUBJECT TO REFILING IN A STATE COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION; JUDGMENT SHALL ENTER IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFFS ON CLAIMS ONE THROUGH SIX; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 1/22/18. (pb)
|
|
Filing
19
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION1 THAT: (1) DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 12 ) BE GRANTED; AND (2) THIS CASE BE TERMINATED ON THE COURTS DOCKET. Objections to R&R due by 11/13/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 10/30/17. (pb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
