McNeil v. Synchrony Bank

McNeil v. Synchrony Bank

Plaintiff:	Michelle McNeil
Defendant:	Synchrony Bank
Case Number:	3:2017cv00171
Filed:	May 16, 2017
Court:	U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Dayton Office
County:	MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge:	Walter H. Rice
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	Civil Miscellaneous Case
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 18, 2017	Filing 10 ORDER - This case is STAYED pending the completion of arbitration inaccordance with the Parties' agreement. The Clerk shall administratively close the file, which is subject to reopening upon motion by any party granting 9 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 8/18/17. (pb)
June 6, 2017	Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT SYNCHRONY BANK'S MOTION FOR ENJARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT RE: 4 - Pursuant to the Motion of Defendant Synchrony Bank ("Synchrony") for an extension of time, the Court now finds that the reque st to allow Synchrony until Friday, July 7, 2017 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint should be GRANTED. The Court makes the following order: 1. Defendant Synchrony Bank shall have to and including Friday, July 7, 2017, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 6/6/2017. (srb)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 18, 2017

Filing 10 ORDER - This case is STAYED pending the completion of arbitration inaccordance with the Parties' agreement. The Clerk shall administratively close the file, which is subject to reopening upon motion by any party granting 9 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 8/18/17. (pb)

June 6, 2017

Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT SYNCHRONY BANK'S MOTION FOR ENJARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT RE: 4 - Pursuant to the Motion of Defendant Synchrony Bank ("Synchrony") for an extension of time, the Court now finds that the reque st to allow Synchrony until Friday, July 7, 2017 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint should be GRANTED. The Court makes the following order: 1. Defendant Synchrony Bank shall have to and including Friday, July 7, 2017, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 6/6/2017. (srb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McNeil v. Synchrony Bank
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle McNeil
Represented By:	David McColl Tannehill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Synchrony Bank
Represented By:	Jeremy R Teaberry
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?