Cutcliffe v. Wright State University
Plaintiff: John Cutcliffe
Defendant: Wright State University
Case Number: 3:2017cv00222
Filed: June 29, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: WARREN
Presiding Judge: Thomas M. Rose
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 47 JUDGMENT ENTRY - For the reasons contained in the Memorandum of Opinion and Order, Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment on all of Plaintiffs claims is granted. Further, Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment on its counterclaim against Plaintiff is granted. The Court hereby enters judgment in favor of Defendant Wright State University and against Plaintiff John Cutcliffe. Plaintiff is hereby ordered to pay Defendant in the amount of $22,845.24, plus pre-judgment interest beginning May 15, 2017 and post-judgment interest. Prejudgment interest shall be at the rate prescribed by Ohio Revised Code § 1343.03. Post-judgment interest shall be at the rate prescribed in 28 U.S.C. § 1961. This case is closed. This Judgment Entry constitutes entry of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 2/4/2019. (srb)
January 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 31 ,GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 32 AND DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION 42 . SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS AWARDED TO DEFENDANT ONPLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AND ON DEFENDANTS COUNTERCLAIM. WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY ISORDERED TO SUBMIT A PROPOSED JUDGMENT ENTRY THAT WOULD EFFECTUATE THIS ORDER ANDTERMINATE THE CASE BY FEBRUARY 1, 2019. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 1-24-2019. (de)
May 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 17 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 5/29/18. (kma)
January 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: 8 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 1/23/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 1-9-18. (mcm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cutcliffe v. Wright State University
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Cutcliffe
Represented By: George M Reul, Jr
Represented By: Jeffrey Michael Silverstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wright State University
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?