Walther v. Florida Tile, Inc. et al
| James Walther |
| Florida Tile, Inc. and Panariagroup USA, Inc. |
| 3:2017cv00257 |
| August 2, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Thomas M. Rose |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS (DOC. 40 ); ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 39 ); GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE (DOC. 29 ); DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY (DOCS. 29 , 30 ); DEN YING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR INSTANTER LEAVE TO [RETROACTIVELY] FILE MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (AND REPLY BRIEF) (DOC. 35 ); DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANT'S RULE 12(C) MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (DOC. 28 ); AND TERMINATING CASE. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 7/13/18. (ep)
|
|
Filing
39
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 1) Plaintiff's Motion To Voluntarily Dismiss Without Prejudice 29 be granted, and the case be dismissed without prejudice; 2) Plaintiff's Motions To Stay [29, 30] be denied as moot; 3) Defendant's Motion F or Instanter Leave To [Retroactively] File Motion For Partial Judgment On The Pleadings (And Reply Brief) 35 be denied; and 4) Defendant's Rule 12(c) Motion For Partial Judgment On The Pleadings 28 be denied without prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 6/22/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 6-8-18. (mcm)
|
|
Filing
27
Stipulated Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 3/12/18. (kma)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER as to Joint Motion for Protective Order 23 - For these reasons, the proposed Stipulated Protective Order will not be approved in its current form. The parties may submit a revised proposed stipulated protective order in compliance with the ho lding in Bankers Trust Co. for the Courts approval and entry. The proposed stipulated protective order must also require a party designating material as CONFIDENTIAL to provide legal justification for filing the document under seal. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 3/6/18. (kma)
|
|
Filing
20
RECUSAL ORDER- This case was randomly assigned to the undersigned upon its filing in August 2017. District Judge Rose has now entered a Preliminary Pretrial Conference Order which refers the case to me for pretrial management purposes (ECF No. 19 , PageID 154). However, many of the dates set in the Order occur after expiration of my term of office on March 1, 2018. Therefore, I recuse myself from further judicial participation in this case and direct theClerk to randomly reassign the case to one of the other Magistrate Judges resident at Dayton. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 10/16/17. (kma)
|
|
Filing
14
AMENDED ENTRY AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 7 . The Court VACATES the hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, previously scheduled for August 31, 2017. The Court sets this matter f or a Preliminary Pretrial Conference on October 12, 2017 at 10:00 AM. The parties should include a proposed date for the hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction with the proposed calendar to be submitted following their Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 8-28-2017. (de)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
