Root et al v. New Jasper Township of et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 8, 2018
DECISION AND ENTRY DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION; OVERRULING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (DOC. #21); JUDGMENT TO ENTER IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFFS; TERMINATION EN TRY- Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court's Order within the time allotted. Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (b), the Court DISMISSES this action for want of prosecution. Said dismissal is WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refiling. The Court OVERRULES AS MOOT Defendants' Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings, Doc. # 21 . Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs. The captioned case is hereby ordered terminated upon the docket records of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 6/7/18. (kma)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|December 19, 2017
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz recused. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 12/19/17. (kma)
|December 6, 2017
ORDER - Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)( l )(A),(8),and(C), and §636(b)(3), the above-captioned action is hereby referred to United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington, ADR Coordinator.. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 12/4/17. (kma)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?