Newman v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission et al
| Peter K Newman |
| Ohio Civil Rights Commission, Leonard J. Hubert, Lori Barreras, Juan Cespedes, William Patmon, III, Madu Singh, G. Michael Payton, Stephanie Bostos-Demers, Desmon Martin, Vera Boggs, Duffy Jamieson, Kathy Haley Ross and Stephan Smith |
| 3:2018cv00088 |
| March 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Thomas M. Rose |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS 5 , (CASE NO. 3:18-CV-88 AND 5 CASE NO. 3:18-CV-89), REMANDING PLAINTIFF"S PETITIONS FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW TO THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, AND TERMINATING THIS CASE. The Court remands Plaintiff's petitions for judicial review to the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose.
|
|
Filing
12
ENTRY AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECUSAL AND GRANTING MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE CASE NOS. 3:18-CV-88 AND 3:18-CV-89- For the reasons above, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs Motion for Recusal (Doc. 9 , Case No. 3:18-cv-88; Doc. 11 , Case No. 3:18-cv-89) a nd GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion to Consolidate (Doc. 9 , Case No. 3:18-cv-88; Doc. 11 , Case No. 3:18-cv-89). Going forward, all filings are to be made in Case No. 3:18-cv-88. Case No. 3:18-cv-89 is hereby TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 9/28/18. (kma) Modified on 9/28/2018 (jmb).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
