Harter v. City of Piqua, et al.
| William Douglas Harter |
| City of Piqua and Gary A. Huff |
| 3:2018cv00391 |
| November 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, filed by City of Piqua. (Becker, Gary) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Gary A. Huff. (Justice, Tabitha) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeremie W Imbus for Defendant City of Piqua (Imbus, Jeremie) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Gary Edward Becker for Defendant City of Piqua (Becker, Gary) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Gary A. Huff on 11/30/2018, answer due 1/29/2019. (Rieman, Michael) |
| Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to City of Piqua on 11/30/2018, answer due 1/29/2019. (Rieman, Michael) |
| Notice: If case is to be referred it will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman. (kma) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against City of Piqua, Gary A. Huff ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-6699274), filed by William Douglas Harter. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D) (Justice, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
