Van Hook v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Michelle Van Hook |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 3:2019cv00044 |
| February 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Michael J Newman |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel Julis for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Julis, Rachel) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. Commissioner of Social Security served on 2/22/2019, answer due 4/23/2019. (Dobson, Stephanie) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (kma) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Michelle Van Hook. (kma) |
Filing 3
NOTATION ORDER granting #2 PLAINTIFF'S Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 2/19/2019. (dm)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Michelle Van Hook. (Dobson, Stephanie) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Michelle Van Hook. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Form, #4 Summons Form, #5 Summons Form, #6 Summons Form) (Dobson, Stephanie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
