Hand v. Warden, North Central Correctional Complex
Ricky Hand |
Warden, North Central Correctional Complex |
3:2019cv00049 |
February 19, 2019 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Michael R Merz |
Thomas M Rose |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 OBJECTION to #9 Report and Recommendations by Petitioner Ricky Hand. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (kma) |
Filing 9 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Petitioner's Objections are not well taken and should be overruled. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 4/12/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 3/28/2019. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
![]() |
Filing 7 OBJECTION to #4 Report and Recommendations by Petitioner Ricky Hand. (jmb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/28/2019: #1 Envelope) (jmb). |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Objections to R&R due by 4/1/2019 (jmb) |
![]() |
Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Ricky Hand New date requested 3/1/2019. by Petitioner Ricky Hand. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (kma) |
Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Conclusion Based on the foregoing analysis, it is respectfully recommended that the Petition herein be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 3/6/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 2/20/2019. (srb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Ricky Hand. (srb) |
![]() |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) by Petitioner Ricky Hand. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Mailing Envelope) (kma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hand v. Warden, North Central Correctional Complex | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Ricky Hand | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden, North Central Correctional Complex | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.