Quinn v. Wright State University et al
Evelyn Quinn |
Wright State University and Andrea L Goubeaux Jordan |
3:2020cv00057 |
February 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Douglas R Cole |
Sharon L Ovington |
Civil Rights: Education |
31 U.S.C. ยง 3545 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Evelyn Quinn (pb) |
NOTATION ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Responses due by 5/1/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 3/30/20. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM New date requested 5/1/2020. by Plaintiff Evelyn Quinn. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (kma) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Mia Meucci Yaniko for Defendants Andrea L Goubeaux Jordan, Wright State University (Yaniko, Mia) Modified Attorney role on 3/20/2020 (rp). |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF OF MOTION TO DISMISS- You are hereby notified that Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss on March 16, 2020. (Doc. #7 ). You should receive a copy of the Motion directly from Defendants. Your response must be filed with the Court not later than April 9, 2020. If you fail to file a timely response, Defendants Motion to Dismiss may be granted and your case dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 3/17/2020. (kma)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants Andrea L Goubeaux Jordan, Wright State University. (Chavez, Lizbeth) |
Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Evelyn Quinn (pb) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendants Andrea L Goubeaux Jordan, Wright State University. Andrea L Goubeaux Jordan served on 3/3/2020, answer due 3/24/2020; Wright State University served on 3/3/2020, answer due 3/24/2020. (pb) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Andrea L Goubeaux Jordan, Wright State University. (kma) |
Filing 3 ORDER- U.S. MARSHAL TO SERVE DEFENDANTS WITH PROCESS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 2/26/2020. (kma)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Wright State University and Andrea L Goubeaux Jordan, filed by Evelyn Quinn. (Attachments: #1 Attachments) (srb) |
NOTATION ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court is directed to hold service of summons pending initial review of the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 2/18/2020. (lk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) by Plaintiff Evelyn Quinn. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Attachment to Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons Form Wright State University, #5 Summons Form Andrea L Goubeaux) (srb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.