Myers v. Commissioner of Social Security
Deborah Myers |
Commissioner of Social Security |
3:2021cv00249 |
September 10, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Michael J Newman |
Sharon L Ovington |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Signed on 10/27/21. (pb) |
Filing 9 DECISION AND ENTRY granting #8 Motion to Remand - The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiff's favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58; This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the parties Motion; and The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 10/27/21. (pb) |
Filing 8 Joint MOTION to Remand by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Sorkin, Adam) |
Filing 7 First CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by Defendant Statement of Errors due by 12/9/2021. (Attachments: #1 Court Transcript, #2 Documents Related to Administrative Process, #3 Payment Documents and Decisions, #4 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices, #5 Non Disability Related Developments, #6 Disability Related Developments, #7 Medical Records Part 1, #8 Medical Records Part 2, #9 Medical Records Part 3, #10 Medical Records Part 4, #11 Medical Records Part 5) (Stark, John) |
Filing 6 ORDER OF CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. This case is referred to the US Magistrate Judge to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of a final judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. Signed by Judge Michael J. Newman on 09/17/2021. (jmb) |
Filing 5 JOINT CONSENT OF THE PARTIES TO PROCEED BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE . (Sorkin, Adam) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam R. Sorkin for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Sorkin, Adam) Modified Attorney Role on 9/16/2021 (rp). |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Deborah Myers. (jmb) |
NOTATION ORDER granting #1 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 9-13-21. (zcc) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Commissioner of Social Security answer due 11/12/2021. (jmb) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Deborah Myers. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 USDC Form) (Walter, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Myers v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Deborah Myers | |
Represented By: | Robert Christopher Walter |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | John J. Stark |
Represented By: | Adam R. Sorkin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.