Smith v. University of Arizona Global Campus et al
| Amy Smith |
| UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GLOBAL CAMPUS, The CBE Group, Inc. and Zovio, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv00017 |
| January 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Michael J Newman |
| Peter B Silvain |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Reset Deadline as to #10 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings .Plaintiff's Response due by 3/22/2023. (srb) |
NOTATION ORDER granting #11 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. The deadline for Plaintiff to file her response to Defendant University of Arizona Global Campus' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. #10 ) is extended through 3/22/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr. on 3/9/2023. (del)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time New date requested 3/22/2023. RESPOND TO DEFENDANT UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GLOBAL CAMPUSS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS by Plaintiff Amy Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Entry) (Flick, Brian) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Defendant University of Arizona Global Campus. (Wager, Amanda) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant University of Arizona Global Campus. (Pyers, Zachary) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #4 Complaint filed by The CBE Group, Inc.. (Gentry, Boyd) |
|
NOTATION ORDER finding as moot #7 Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw. As Ms. Ramirez is not admitted to practice in the Southern District of Ohio, her appearance has not been accepted by this Court. Accordingly, a motion to withdraw is not appropriate. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr. on 1/19/2023. (del)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Withdraw APPEARANCE OF MARITA I. RAMIREZ by Plaintiff Amy Smith. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Proposed Order) (Flick, Brian) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel - Pursuant to Southern District of Ohio Local Rule 83.4(e), unless otherwise ordered, in all actions filed in, transferred to or removed to this Court, all parties, other than pro se parties must be represented at all times by a trial attorney who is a permanent member of the bar of this Court in good standing. Original document removed and replaced on 1/18/2023 to correct case number. (bjr). |
| Filing 5 (COPY of) ANSWER of Defendant, The University of Arizona Global Campus (Jury Demand Endorsed Hereon) re #4 Complaint with Jury Demand. Originally filed in the Montgomery County Common Pleas Court on January 17, 2023, under Case No. 2022cv05614 by The University of Arizona Global Campus. (bjr) |
| Filing 4 (COPY of) COMPLAINT for Damages with JURY DEMAND endorsed hereon against All Defendants. Originally filed in the Montgomery County Common Pleas Court under Case No. 2022cv05614 by Plaintiff, Amy Smith on December 14, 2022. (bjr) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants The CBE Group, Inc., CBE Group, Inc identifying Corporate Parent CBE Group, Inc for The CBE Group, Inc... (Gentry, Boyd) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Defendant The CBE Group, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, co-defendants' consent to removal (Gentry, Boyd) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2022 CV 05614 ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9220988), filed by The CBE Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint and state court docket, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) (Gentry, Boyd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
