Johnson v. Warden
| Michael Vincent Johnson |
| Warden LECI Chae Harris and Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution |
| 3:2023cv00251 |
| August 30, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Kimberly A Jolson |
| Michael J Newman |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Hilda Rosenberg for Defendant Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution (Rosenberg, Hilda) |
Filing 3
ORDER: It is ORDERED that Respondent shall file an answer conforming to the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases within sixty (60) days of the date of filing of this Order. Petitioner may, not later than twenty-one (21) days after the answer is filed, file and serve a reply to the answer. The Clerk is ordered to serve the petition on respondent and the Attorney General of Ohio, Habeas Corpus Unit of the Corrections Litigation Section c/o Brian.Higgins@OhioAGO.gov and Habeas.docketclerk@OhioAGO.gov. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 9/1/2023. (er)
|
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet - by Plaintiff, Michael Vincent Johnson re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Jackson, Kory) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number AOHSDC-9578390.), filed by Michael Vincent Johnson. (Jackson, Kory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
