Williams v. Commisioner of Social Security
Bradford Eugene Williams |
Commisioner of Social Security |
SSA |
3:2024cv00297 |
November 14, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Karen L Litkovitz |
Michael J Newman |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 425 Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Plaintiff's Statement of Errors due by 2/18/2025. (art) |
Filing 7 First CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by Defendant Statement of Errors due by 2/18/2025. (Attachments: #1 002 Court Transcript Index, #2 003 Documents Related to Administrative Process Including Transcript of Oral Hearing, if applicable, #3 004 Payment Documents and Decisions, #4 005 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices, #5 006 Non Disability Related Development, #6 007 Disability Related Development, #7 008 Medical Records Part 1, #8 009 Medical Records Part 2, #9 010 Medical Records Part 3, #10 011 Medical Records Part 4, #11 012 Medical Records Part 5, #12 013 Medical Records Part 6, #13 014 Medical Records Part 7, #14 015 Medical Records Part 8, #15 016 Medical Records Part 9, #16 017 Medical Records Part 10, #17 018 Medical Records Part 11, #18 019 Medical Records Part 12, #19 020 Medical Records Part 13, #20 021 Medical Records Part 14, #21 022 Medical Records Part 15, #22 023 Medical Records Part 16) (Stark, John) |
Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Bradford Eugene Williams. (kev) |
![]() |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to #S.D. Ohio General Order 22-04, there is no unanimous consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to randomly assign this case to a resident District Judge. (jmb) |
Judge Michael J. Newman and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz added. Motions referred to Karen L. Litkovitz. (jmb) |
Set Deadlines per #4 Order: Commisioner of Social Security answer due 1/14/2025. (kev) |
Filing 3 Statement As To Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form. The completed Statement As To Magistrate Jurisdiction Form shall be completed and emailed to the Court's Social Security Case Coordinator at, SSA_Coordinator@ohsd.uscourts.gov or mailed to: Office of the ClerkWalter H. Rice Federal Buildingand U.S. CourthouseRoom 712Attn: Social Security Coordinator200 W. Second StreetDayton, Ohio 45402DO NOT ELECTRONICALLY FILE THIS DOCUMENT, IT MUST BE MAILED TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS OR EMAILED TO SSA_Coordinator@ohsd.uscourts.gov. The completed Statement As To Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form due by 12/16/2024 (jmb) |
Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE and GENERAL ORDER 22-04: Pursuant to #S.D. Ohio General Order 22-04, if no party indicates that they are withholding their consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, the case will remain with the assigned Magistrate Judge for all matters, including entry of a final judgment. Further, the filing of a party's statement of errors or memorandum in opposition without first filing an executed copy of the Statement as to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form will also be deemed as consent by that party to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over all aspects of the litigation, including entry of a final judgment. (jmb) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Bradford Eugene Williams. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 SSID Form) (Donoff, Marilyn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.