Volner v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff: Anthony Volner
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Case Number: 6:2011cv00003
Filed: January 3, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma
Office: Muskogee Office
County: Muskogee
Presiding Judge: James H. Payne
Nature of Suit: Federal Employers Liability
Cause of Action: 45 U.S.C. ยง 51
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 63 JUDGMENT by District Judge James H. Payne: entering judgment in favor of Union Pacific Railroad Company against Anthony Volner (terminates case) (cjt, Deputy Clerk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Volner v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Volner
Represented By: M. Jared Medlock
Represented By: Roy Gean, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Represented By: Jeffrey Fields
Represented By: Robert D. Hart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?