Womack v. Jones et al
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Petitioner:
Bryan Dean Womack
Case Number:
6:2012cv00399
Filed:
September 24, 2012
Court:
Oklahoma Eastern District Court
Office:
Muskogee Office
County:
Love
Referring Judge:
Kimberly E. West
Presiding Judge:
Frank H. Seay
Nature of Suit:
Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:
28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:
None
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| June 24, 2013 | 20 |
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Frank H. Seay, denying certificate of appealability(acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
| June 14, 2013 | 18 |
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Frank H. Seay, denying certificate of appealability(acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
| November 7, 2012 | 11 |
OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kimberly E. West, directing Respondent to show cause why the writ should not issue and file a response to the petition.(Responses due by 12/7/2012)(sjw, Chambers)
|
| September 24, 2012 | 8 |
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 5 Report and Recommendation. Case transferred to the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Oklahoma. Signed by Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti on 9/24/2012. (mb) [Transferred from okwd on 9/25/2012.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.