Bray v. Department of Public Safety et al
Bobby Ryan Bray |
Department of Public Safety, Oklahoma Highway Patrol and Daniel Eaton |
6:2019cv00078 |
March 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
Ronald A White |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Jon M. Williford on behalf of Department of Public Safety (Williford, Jon) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Jon M. Williford on behalf of Daniel Eaton (Williford, Jon) |
Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk, Defendant is directed to pay the $400 filing fee within 7 days. Failure to comply with this directive will subject this action to immediate dismissal by the Court without prejudice to refiling. (Filing Fee due by 3/14/2019)(jcb, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Removal from Haskell County District Court, case number CJ-19-005 by Daniel Eaton (With attachments)(jcb, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Daniel Eaton (jcb, Deputy Clerk) |
FILING FEES Paid in Full on 3/7/2019 in the amount of $400, receipt number 1086-1249008 (Re: #2 Notice of Removal ) by Daniel Eaton (Williford, Jon) |
PETITION/COMPLAINT filed in State Court against Department of Public Safety, Daniel Eaton, Oklahoma Highway Patrol by Bobby Ryan Bray (jcb, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.