Roppollo v. Yates et al
| 6:2019cv00127 |
| April 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
| Muskogee Office |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge John F. Heil, III : Granting 76 87 defendants Motion to Dismiss. Terminating party Jane or John Doe 2 for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Randy Knight, FNU Sanders, Donnie Anderson are dismissed without prejudice for failure to effect service. Plaintiff's request for injunctive relief is DENIED. (acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
47
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White: Plaintiff's motion to file a third amended complaint 42 is GRANTED. Plaintiff is directed to file within thirty (30) days a third amended complaint on the Court's form as directed in this Order.(acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing
5
OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge James H. Payne: Plaintiff is directed to file within twenty-one (21) days an amended complaint on the Courts form as directed in this Order. Failure to comply with this Order will result in dismissal of this action without further notice.(acg, Deputy Clerk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Roppollo v. Yates et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
