Daniels v. Social Security Administration
James A. Daniels |
Social Security Administration |
6:2022cv00210 |
July 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma |
Kimberly E West |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to Social Security Administration by serving the Office of the Regional Counsel. (adw, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to Social Security Administration by serving the Office of the U.S. Attorney. (adw, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kimberly E. West : Finding as moot #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, filing fee paid in full on 8/4/22. (acg, Deputy Clerk) |
FILING FEES Paid in Full on 8/4/2022 in the amount of $402, receipt number AOKEDC-1688563 (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) by James A. Daniels (White, Timothy) |
Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kimberly E. West: In reviewing Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Docket Entry #4), this Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to indicate (1) employment status; (2) the estimated value of real property owned and the value of his vehicle; (3) his total monthly living expenses; and (4) the amount and source of money used by Plaintiff to sustain himself. Plaintiff shall submit a notarized, Amended Motion with the required information no later than AUGUST 5, 2022. Thereafter, the Court will evaluate the information as to whether Plaintiff qualifies for in forma pauperis status.(acg, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by James A. Daniels Responses due by 8/8/2022(White, Timothy) |
Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk, directing Plaintiff to pay the filing fee of $402 within 7 days or file a Motion for Informa Pauperis. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this directive will subject this action to immediate dismissal by the Court without prejudice to refiling. NOTE: The court cannot issue summons until the filing fee is paid. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the court's PDF version and email it to CM-ECFIntake_OKED@oked.uscourts.gov. Consent forms provided to filing party. (Filing Fee due by 7/29/2022)(jcb, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration by James A. Daniels (With attachments)(jcb, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by James A. Daniels (jcb, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Daniels v. Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: James A. Daniels | |
Represented By: | Timothy M. White |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.