Wilson v. Sirmons, et al
| 4:2000cv00147 |
| February 16, 2000 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus Office |
| Claire V Eagan |
| Frank H McCarthy |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Claire V Eagan that Wilson's petition for habeas corpus relief based on ineffective assistnce of counsel (Dkt. # 16) is denied; granting (Dkt. #81) Wilson's motion to expand the record ; gra nting 81 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Re: 41 Decision from Circuit Court, 30 Judgment, Entering Judgment, 40 Decision from Circuit Court, 88 Exhibit(s) in Support of Document(s), 16 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 87 Exhibit(s) in Support of Document(s), Exhibit(s) in Support of Document(s), 76 Minutes of Evidentiary Hearing,, Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s), Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s),, 42 Mandate from Circuit Court ) (RGG, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
75
OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Claire V Eagan ; granting 73 Motion in Limine (RGG, Chambers)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wilson v. Sirmons, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
