Stemple v. Gibson
Defendant: Randall G Workman
Petitioner: Timothy Shaun Stemple
Case Number: 4:2001cv00166
Filed: March 8, 2001
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Office: Tulsa Office
County: Pittsburg
Presiding Judge: Paul J Cleary
Presiding Judge: Gregory K Frizzell
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 53 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell ; adding party Randall G Workman rep by Seth Shannon Branham terminating party Gary G Gibson ; denying 21 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (hbo, Dpty Clk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stemple v. Gibson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Timothy Shaun Stemple
Represented By: Stephen James Greubel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Randall G Workman
Represented By: Seth Shannon Branham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?