Bishop, et al v. Oklahoma, State of, et al
Case Number: 4:2004cv00848
Filed: November 3, 2004
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Office: Tulsa Office
Presiding Judge: Sam A Joyner
Presiding Judge: Terence Kern
Nature of Suit: Constitutional - State Statute
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 272 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Terence Kern ; dismissing/terminating case (terminates case) ; granting in part and denying in part 197 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 211 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; finding as moot 214 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 216 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 257 Motion for Judgment; granting 263 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (vah, Chambers) (Main Document 272 replaced on 1/17/2014) (sac, Dpty Clk). Modified on 1/17/2014 to fix typographical errors per ORDER 277 (sac, Dpty Clk).
November 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 148 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Terence Kern ; terminating party Oklahoma, State of ; granting in part and denying in part 128 Motion to Dismiss Party (vah, Chambers)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bishop, et al v. Oklahoma, State of, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?