Avington v. Juvenile Affairs, Office of et al
A V Avington, Jr |
Juvenile Affairs, Office of and L.E. Rader Juvenile Justice Center |
4:2008cv00571 |
September 26, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
Tulsa |
Claire V Eagan |
Frank H McCarthy |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Claire V Eagan that Defendant's [sic] Motion for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint and Brief in Support (Dkt. # 15) is granted. Plaintiff's claims alleging discrimination based on race , color, religion and national origin (part of Third Cause of Action), his failure to promote claim (Second Cause of Action), and his demand for punitive damages are dismissed. Defendant L.E. Rader Juvenile Justice Center is terminated as a party to this action. The caption is hereby amended to delete reference to L.E. Rader Juvenile Justice Center as a defendant. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint no later than March 26, 2009 clarifying his failure to promote claim (Second Cause of Actio n) if he can allege specific facts that occurred before September 7, 2007 and show that the EEOC could have been expected to investigate these factual allegations as part of its investigation. ; terminating party L.E. Rader Juvenile Justice Center ; granting 15 Motion to Dismiss (Re: 1 Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.