Chancellor v. Town of Sportsmen Acres et al
| Rena Chancellor |
| Town of Sportsmen Acres, Rex Morgan, Dennis Logan and Dusty Brower |
| 4:2011cv00762 |
| December 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Tulsa Office |
| Mayes |
| Gregory K Frizzell |
| Frank H McCarthy |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John E Dowdell The Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants Rex Morgan, Dennis Logan, and Dusty Brower (Doc. 14) is granted as to plaintiff's § 1983 claims. The Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant Tow n of Sportsmen Acres (Doc. 12) is moot to the extent it seeks summary judgment as to plaintiff's Burk claim. Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and Brief in Support (Doc. 17) is denied to the extent it seeks summary judgment as to her § 1983 claims and moot as to her Burk claim. Defendants' Motion in Limine (Doc. 16) and plaintiff's Motion in Limine and Brief in Support (Doc. 18) are moot. The plaintiff's state law Burk claim is hereby remanded to t he Mayes County District Court ; remanding case (terminates case) ; finding as moot 12 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 14 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 16 Motion in Limine; denying 17 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; finding as moot 18 Motion in Limine (Re: 2 Notice of Removal ) (SAS, Chambers)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
