ArCzar, LLC v. Navico, Inc.
||December 29, 2011
||Oklahoma Northern District Court
||XX US, Outside State
||Paul J Cleary
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 2, 2012
OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that Defendant Navico, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Complaint (Dkt. # 29) is granted in part and denied in part; it is granted as to plaintiff's claims of indirect infringement but denied as to plaintiff's claims of direct infringement. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint re-alleging its patent infringement claims no later than August 9, 2012. ; granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion to Dismiss (Re: 2 Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.