Spears v. E-Z Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joshua Spears
Defendant:
E-Z Mart Stores, Inc.
Case Number:
4:2012cv00017
Filed:
January 17, 2012
Court:
Oklahoma Northern District Court
Office:
Tulsa Office
County:
Tulsa
Presiding Judge:
Claire V Eagan
Referring Judge:
T Lane Wilson
Nature of Suit:
Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action:
42:12101
Jury Demanded By:
Defendant
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
March 26, 2013 | 48 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Spears v. E-Z Mart Stores, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Joshua Spears | |
Represented By: | Daniel E Smolen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: E-Z Mart Stores, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Ray Thompson Hillis |
Represented By: | Shannon Paige Wheeler |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.