Cole v. Trammell
Petitioner: Benjamin Cole
Respondent: Anita Trammell
Case Number: 4:2015cv00049
Filed: January 30, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Office: Tulsa Office
County: Pittsburg
Presiding Judge: Paul J Cleary
Presiding Judge: Gregory K Frizzell
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 11 OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge Gregory K Frizzell Case stayed to allow exhaustion of state court remedy. Stay is conditiioned on commencing a mandamus within 14 days., staying case (hbo, Dpty Clk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cole v. Trammell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Benjamin Cole
Represented By: Thomas David Hird
Represented By: Susan Margaret Otto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Anita Trammell
Represented By: Jennifer J Dickson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?