Rogers v. Rios

Rogers v. Rios

Petitioner:	William Buck Rogers
Respondent:	H A Rios, Jr
Case Number:	4:2017cv00060
Filed:	February 7, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Office:	Tulsa Office
County:	Comanche
Presiding Judge:	Claire V Eagan
Presiding Judge:	Frank H McCarthy
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 25, 2021	Filing 26 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - The motion for reconsideration out of time (Dkt. # 21), construed as a Rule 60(b)(6) motion and treated as a second or successive habeas petition, is dismissed without prejudice for lack of juris diction. To the extent the motion for reconsideration out of time (Dkt. # 21) could be construed, in part, as a motion to reopen the time to appeal, that motion is denied. To the extent the motion for reconsideration out of time (Dkt. # 21) could be construed, in part, as a "true" Rule 60(b) motion, that motion is denied and a certificate of appealability is denied. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. # 22) is denied as moot. The motion for enlargement of time (Dkt. # 24) is denied as moot. ; dismissing 21 Motion to Reconsider; finding as moot 22 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; finding as moot 24 Motion to Accelerate/Extend/Reset Hearing(s)/Deadline(s) (Re: 19 Opinio n and Order,,, Denying Certificate of Appealability,,,,,, Ruling on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241/2254),, 24 MOTION to Accelerate/Extend/Reset Hearing(s)/Deadline(s) , 20 Judgment,, Entering Judgment,,, 21 MOTION to Reconsider , 22 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis ) (RGG, Chambers)
April 1, 2020	Filing 19 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - The Clerk of Court shall note the substitution of Scott Crow, in place of Joe Allbaugh, as party respondent. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. # 3) is denied. Petitioner's reque st for an evidentiary hearing is denied. A certificate of appealability is denied. ; denying certificate of appealability; denying 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241/2254) (Re: 3 First PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 (paid $5 filing fee; receipt number 1085-1708353) ) (RGG, Chambers)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 25, 2021

Filing 26 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - The motion for reconsideration out of time (Dkt. # 21), construed as a Rule 60(b)(6) motion and treated as a second or successive habeas petition, is dismissed without prejudice for lack of juris diction. To the extent the motion for reconsideration out of time (Dkt. # 21) could be construed, in part, as a motion to reopen the time to appeal, that motion is denied. To the extent the motion for reconsideration out of time (Dkt. # 21) could be construed, in part, as a "true" Rule 60(b) motion, that motion is denied and a certificate of appealability is denied. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. # 22) is denied as moot. The motion for enlargement of time (Dkt. # 24) is denied as moot. ; dismissing 21 Motion to Reconsider; finding as moot 22 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; finding as moot 24 Motion to Accelerate/Extend/Reset Hearing(s)/Deadline(s) (Re: 19 Opinio n and Order,,, Denying Certificate of Appealability,,,,,, Ruling on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241/2254),, 24 MOTION to Accelerate/Extend/Reset Hearing(s)/Deadline(s) , 20 Judgment,, Entering Judgment,,, 21 MOTION to Reconsider , 22 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis ) (RGG, Chambers)

April 1, 2020

Filing 19 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - The Clerk of Court shall note the substitution of Scott Crow, in place of Joe Allbaugh, as party respondent. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. # 3) is denied. Petitioner's reque st for an evidentiary hearing is denied. A certificate of appealability is denied. ; denying certificate of appealability; denying 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241/2254) (Re: 3 First PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 (paid $5 filing fee; receipt number 1085-1708353) ) (RGG, Chambers)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rogers v. Rios
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: William Buck Rogers
Represented By:	Andrew Michael-Don Casey
Represented By:	Carla ReNae Stinnett
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: H A Rios, Jr
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?