Ipock v. Manor Care of Tulsa OK, LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Tenth Circuit Oklahoma Northern District Ipock v. Manor Care of Tulsa OK, LLC

Ipock v. Manor Care of Tulsa OK, LLC

Plaintiff:	Brian Ipock
Defendant:	Manor Care of Tulsa OK, LLC
Case Number:	4:2017cv00106
Filed:	March 3, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Office:	Tulsa Office
County:	Tulsa
Presiding Judge:	Claire V Eagan
Presiding Judge:	T Lane Wilson
Nature of Suit:	Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 4, 2017	Filing 15 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - Defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 10) is denied. Defendant's motion to compel arbitration and stay these proceedings (Dkt. # 8) is granted in part and denied in part: it is gra nted as to plaintiff's negligence claim and denied as to plaintiff's wrongful death claim. Plaintiff's Motion for Court to Give Notice to the Oklahoma Attorney General of Plaintiff's Constitutional Challenge of 12 O.S. (2013) 67; 19.1 (Dkt. # 13) is moot. This suit is stayed pending the completion of the arbitration of the negligence claim. The parties shall file a joint statement advising the Court of the arbitrator's decision within 15 days of the completion o f the arbitration proceedings. ; staying case; granting in part and denying in part 8 Motion to Compel Arbitration; denying 10 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 13 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 4, 2017

Filing 15 OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - Defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 10) is denied. Defendant's motion to compel arbitration and stay these proceedings (Dkt. # 8) is granted in part and denied in part: it is gra nted as to plaintiff's negligence claim and denied as to plaintiff's wrongful death claim. Plaintiff's Motion for Court to Give Notice to the Oklahoma Attorney General of Plaintiff's Constitutional Challenge of 12 O.S. (2013) 67; 19.1 (Dkt. # 13) is moot. This suit is stayed pending the completion of the arbitration of the negligence claim. The parties shall file a joint statement advising the Court of the arbitrator's decision within 15 days of the completion o f the arbitration proceedings. ; staying case; granting in part and denying in part 8 Motion to Compel Arbitration; denying 10 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 13 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Re: State Court Petition/Complaint ) (RGG, Chambers)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ipock v. Manor Care of Tulsa OK, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Ipock
Represented By:	Richard Andrew Shallcross
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Manor Care of Tulsa OK, LLC
Represented By:	Jake Jones, III
Represented By:	Jennifer Faith Sherrill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?