Matlock v. Bryant

Petitioner: Michael A Matlock
Respondent: Jason Bryant
Case Number: 4:2017cv00645
Filed: November 30, 2017
Court: Oklahoma Northern District Court
Office: Tulsa Office
County: Alfalfa
Presiding Judge: John E Dowdell
Referring Judge: Frank H McCarthy
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 12, 2018 11 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER by Judge John E Dowdell Respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. 6) is granted. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies. A certificate of appealability is denied. ; dismissing/terminating case (terminates case) ; denying certificate of appealability; granting 6 Motion to Dismiss; dismissing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241/2254) (SAS, Chambers)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Matlock v. Bryant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael A Matlock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jason Bryant
Represented By: Diane L Slayton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?