Orlovetz v. Social Security Administration
Michelle Orlovetz |
Social Security Administration |
4:2018cv00329 |
June 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
Tulsa Office |
Craig |
Jodi F Jayne |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Social Security Administration Served: Office of Regional Counsel 7/16/18 (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) by Michelle Orlovetz (With attachments) (Coring, Sam) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Social Security Administration Served Atty General 7/16/18 (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) by Michelle Orlovetz (With attachments) (Coring, Sam) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Social Security Administration served U.S. Atty 7/13/18 (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint ) by Michelle Orlovetz (With attachments) (Coring, Sam) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Jeffrey Andrew Gallant on behalf of Social Security Administration [Note: Attorney Jeffrey Andrew Gallant added to party Social Security Administration(pty:dft).] (Gallant, Jeffrey) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to Social Security Administration (sc, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jodi F Jayne ; granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; granting #4 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice; granting #5 Motion to Waive (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (kah, Chambers) |
***Remark: 3 summons in hold tray (sc, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 7 STATEMENT Consenting to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction by Michelle Orlovetz (Coring, Sam) |
Filing 6 NOTICE by Court Clerk of Assignment of Case to a United States Magistrate Judge [includes the following attachments: (1) a Statement as to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form, and (2) a copy of General Order 16-08] (sc, Dpty Clk) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Waive Requirement of Association of Local Counsel by Michelle Orlovetz (Coring, Sam) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Attorney(s) Sam Coring to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $50 PHV fee; receipt number 1085-1931445) by Michelle Orlovetz (With attachments) (Coring, Sam) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Michelle Orlovetz (Coring, Sam) |
Filing 2 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration by Michelle Orlovetz (Coring, Sam) |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Michelle Orlovetz (Coring, Sam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Orlovetz v. Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michelle Orlovetz | |
Represented By: | Sam M Coring |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey Andrew Gallant |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.