Sneed v. Walton et al
| Jimmie Otto Sneed, II |
| Scott Walton and Dereck Davis |
| 4:2019cv00399 |
| July 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Claire V Eagan |
| Jodi F Jayne |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan , directing parties to file joint status report ( Status Report due by 9/18/2019) (RGG, Chambers)
|
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Thomas Adrian LeBlanc on behalf of Scott Walton [Note: Attorney Thomas Adrian LeBlanc added to party Scott Walton(pty:dft).] (LeBlanc, Thomas) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER with Jury Demand (Re: #2 Complaint ) by Scott Walton (McDonald, Ryan) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Ryan Alan McDonald on behalf of Scott Walton [Note: Attorney Ryan Alan McDonald added to party Scott Walton(pty:dft).] (McDonald, Ryan) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed re: Scott Walton (Re: #2 Complaint ) by Jimmie Otto Sneed, II (Smolen, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to All Defendants (jln, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants (paid $400 filing fee; receipt number 1085-2081525) by Jimmie Otto Sneed, II (Smolen, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Jimmie Otto Sneed, II (Smolen, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
