Xiong v. Yates
Petitioner: Fue Xiong
Respondent: James Yates
Case Number: 4:2019cv00456
Filed: August 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Claire V Eagan
Referring Judge: Jodi F Jayne
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION to Stay pending exhaustion (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254) by Fue Xiong (sc, Dpty Clk)
August 16, 2019 Filing 2 FILING FEES Paid in Full by Fue Xiong (sc, Dpty Clk)
August 16, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 by Fue Xiong (sc, Dpty Clk) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/16/2019: #3 Exhibit OCCA Opinion F-2016-1089, #4 Exhibit Brief of Appellant, #5 Exhibit Brief of Appellee, #6 Exhibit Copy of PRCA, #7 Exhibit Copy of Motion for Evidentiary Hearing) (sc, Dpty Clk).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Xiong v. Yates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: James Yates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Fue Xiong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?