Ross v. Pettigrew
| Beverly W Ross |
| Luke Pettigrew |
| 4:2020cv00396 |
| August 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| John E Dowdell |
| Frank H McCarthy |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Julie Armendia Pittman on behalf of Luke Pettigrew [Note: Attorney Julie Armendia Pittman added to party Luke Pettigrew(pty:res).] (Pittman, Julie) |
Filing 7
ORDER by Chief Judge John E Dowdell , directing Respondent to show cause why the writ should not issue and file a response to the petition( Responses due by 10/28/2020, Replies due by 11/27/2020) (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) (SAS, Chambers)
|
| ***Remark: Emailed docket numbers 1 and 7 to the Office of the Attorney General at fhc.docket@oag.ok.gov (Re: #7 Order,, Directing Respondent to Show Cause re: PWHC, ) (sc, Dpty Clk) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE re: filing fee by Beverly W Ross (sc, Dpty Clk) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER by Chief Judge John E Dowdell ; setting/resetting Filing Fee deadline(s): ( Filing Fee due by 9/24/2020); denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (SAS, Chambers)
|
| Filing 6 FILING FEES Paid in Full by Beverly W Ross (dlg, Dpty Clk) (Main Document 6 replaced on 9/17/2020) (dlg, Dpty Clk). |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Beverly W Ross (alg, Dpty Clk) |
| ***Remark: mailed Petitioner a blank motion to proceed in forma pauperis (form AO-240), identified for Case No. 20-CV-0396-JED-FHM to: Beverly W Ross #190290 JHCC B2-207 PO BOX 548 LEXINGTON, OK 73051 (sac, Dpty Clk) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER by Chief Judge John E Dowdell Within 30 days from the entry of this order, or by September 16, 2020, Petitioner shall either (1) pay the $5 filing fee or (2) submit a properly supported motion to proceed in forma pauperis on the court-approved form, along with a statement of institutional accounts reflecting the current balance(s) in Petitioner's inmate account(s). The Clerk of Court shall send to Petitioner a blank motion to proceed in forma pauperis (form AO-240), identified for Case No. 20-CV-0396-JED-FHM., setting/resetting Filing Fee deadline(s): ( Filing Fee due by 9/16/2020) (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 ) (SAS, Chambers)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254 by Beverly W Ross (jjs, Dpty Clk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ross v. Pettigrew | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Beverly W Ross | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Luke Pettigrew | |
| Represented By: | Julie Armendia Pittman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
