Laca et al v. United States of America et al
| Moris Laca and Suela Tafani |
| United States of America and Scott W Jones |
| 4:2022cv00366 |
| August 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Susan E Huntsman |
| Terence Kern |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
MOTION Amend Tort Claim Demands by Moris Laca, Suela Tafani (Lyons, Mark)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Returned Executed re: United States of America (Re: #2 Complaint ) by Moris Laca, Suela Tafani (Lyons, Mark)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS Returned Executed re: United States of America (Re: #2 Complaint ) by Moris Laca, Suela Tafani (Lyons, Mark)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Unexecuted re: Scott W Jones (Re: #2 Complaint ) by Moris Laca, Suela Tafani (Lyons, Mark)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to Scott W Jones, United States of America (blc, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Mark Donaldson Lyons on behalf of Moris Laca, Suela Tafani (Lyons, Mark)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Scott W Jones, United States of America (paid $402 filing fee; receipt number AOKNDC-2665315) by Moris Laca, Suela Tafani (Lyons, Mark)
|
|
Filing 1
CIVIL COVER SHEET by Moris Laca, Suela Tafani (Lyons, Mark)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
