Bridge v. Social Security Administration
| Terri L Bridge and Terri Casebolt |
| Social Security Administration |
| 4:2022cv00406 |
| September 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma |
| Susan E Huntsman |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Issued by Court Clerk as to Social Security Administration (lmt, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan E Huntsman ; granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; granting #5 Motion to Waive (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (kah, Chambers)
|
|
***Remark: 3 summons in hold tray (sc, Dpty Clk)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Waive Requirement of Association of Local Counsel by Terri L Bridge (Parmele, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 4
ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Daniel A Parmele on behalf of Terri L Bridge (Parmele, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Terri L Bridge (Parmele, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 2
SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration by Terri L Bridge (Parmele, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 1
CIVIL COVER SHEET by Terri L Bridge [Note: Attorney Daniel A Parmele added to party Terri L Bridge(pty:pla).] (Parmele, Daniel)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
