Weiler v. Boncher
Petitioner: Gregory A Weiler, II
Respondent: Warden Boncher
Case Number: 4:2022cv00487
Filed: November 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Claire V Eagan
Referring Judge: Jodi F Jayne
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Gregory A Weiler, II (blc, Dpty Clk)
December 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 by Gregory A Weiler, II (blc, Dpty Clk)
December 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION for Writ by Gregory A Weiler, II (sc, Dpty Clk)
December 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - ORDER TO CURE DEFICIENCIES - The motion to stay (Dkt. # 2) is denied; no later than 21 days after the entry of this order, or on or before December 29, 2022, Weiler shall either pay the $5 filing fee or file a properly supported motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, using the court-approved form; the Clerk of Court shall send to Weiler one blank motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (form AO 240), identified for Case No. 22 CV 0487-CVE JFJ; no later than 21 days after the entry of this order, or on or before December 29, 2022, Weiler shall file a properly completed petition for writ of habeas corpus, using the court-approved form; and the Clerk of Court shall send to Weiler one blank 28 U.S.C. 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus (form AO-242), identified for Case No. 22-CV-0487-CVE-JFJ. ; setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Filing Fee due by 12/29/2022, Miscellaneous Deadline set for 12/29/2022); directing court clerk to take action; denying #2 Motion to Stay (Re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 , #2 MOTION to Stay ) (RGG, Chambers)
December 8, 2022 Opinion or Order ***Remark: one blank motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (form AO 240), identified for Case No. 22 CV 0487-CVE JFJ, MA 01432 and one blank 28 U.S.C. 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus (form AO-242), identified for Case No. 22-CV-0487-CVE-JFJ mailed to Gregory A Weiler, II #12291-062 FMC Devens PO BOX 879 AYER, MA 01432. (Re: #3 Order,,,,, Setting/Resetting Deadline(s)/Hearing(s),,,,, Directing Court Clerk to Take Action,,,,,,,,,, Ruling on Motion to Stay,,,, ) (blc, Dpty Clk)
November 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to Stay by Gregory A Weiler, II (ll, Dpty Clk)
November 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 by Gregory A Weiler, II (blc, Dpty Clk) ((blc, Dpty Clk). Modified on 11/3/2022 - removed blank page from pdf, #1 image is as legible as the original. (blc, Dpty Clk).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Weiler v. Boncher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gregory A Weiler, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Boncher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?