Short v. Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: John A Short, Jr
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 4:2025cv00030
Filed: January 17, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Presiding Judge: Susan E Huntsman
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2025 Filing 9 ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSCRIPT (Re: #2 Social Security Complaint, ) by Social Security Administration (With attachments) (Cooper, Michael)
January 24, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan E Huntsman ; granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; granting #4 Motion to Waive (This entry is the Official Order of the Court. No document is attached.) (kah, Chambers)
January 24, 2025 Filing 7 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Michael James Cooper on behalf of Social Security Administration [Note: Attorney Michael James Cooper added to party Social Security Administration(pty:dft).] (Cooper, Michael)
January 17, 2025 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF CASE TO A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DECLINATION OF CONSENT FORM. ACTION REQUIRED: This case has been randomly assigned to a United States magistrate judge for all purposes, including trial, final entry of judgment, and direct review by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. Each party will be deemed to have knowingly and voluntarily consented to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge, if the attached form is not signed and returned within the applicable deadline. The plaintiff or removing party must serve a copy of this notice upon all other parties to this action. (atn, Dpty Clk)
January 17, 2025 Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Kelsey Young on behalf of John A Short, Jr (Young, Kelsey)
January 17, 2025 Filing 4 MOTION to Waive Requirement for Association of Local Counsel by John A Short, Jr (Young, Kelsey)
January 17, 2025 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by John A Short, Jr (Young, Kelsey)
January 17, 2025 Filing 2 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration (Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Fed. R. Civ. P. Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions, the Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) for this Complaint has been transmitted to the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Oklahoma, as well as the Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel. No summons will issue.) by John A Short, Jr (Young, Kelsey)
January 17, 2025 Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by John A Short, Jr (Young, Kelsey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oklahoma Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Short v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John A Short, Jr
Represented By: Kelsey Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Michael James Cooper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?