Ball et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Plaintiff:
Darlene Ball
Case Number:
5:2012cv01077
Filed:
September 28, 2012
Court:
Oklahoma Western District Court
Office:
Oklahoma City Office
County:
Pottawatomie
Presiding Judge:
Joe Heaton
Nature of Suit:
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action:
28:1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By:
Defendant
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oklahoma Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ball et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Robert H Alexander, Jr |
| Represented By: | Robert W Ivy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Darlene Ball | |
| Represented By: | Curtis N Bruehl |
| Represented By: | Curtis N Bruehl |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.